On this page 11 sections
- The short version
- What is the EPYC 4005 series?
- Spec sheet: EPYC 4585PX vs 9950X3D vs 9950X
- ECC on AM5: what it protects
- Memory: capacity, speed and the two-channel ceiling
- PCIe lanes and storage
- Benchmarks: what Phoronix measured
- Prices and configurations at PowerDedi
- Which one should you choose?
- When to step up to EPYC 9004 or 9005
- Sources
The EPYC 4585PX is AMD’s server-validated version of the Ryzen 9 9950X3D: the same 16 Zen 5 cores, 5.7 GHz boost and 128 MB of L3, with ECC memory supported across the platform. Choose it for databases and paid hosting, the 9950X3D for maximum memory, and the 9950X for price/performance.
The short version
| As of October 2026 | EPYC 4585PX | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen 9 9950X |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicon | 16 Zen 5 cores, 128 MB L3 | 16 Zen 5 cores, 128 MB L3 | 16 Zen 5 cores, 64 MB L3 |
| ECC memory | Validated for the whole series | Supported if the motherboard supports it | Supported if the motherboard supports it |
| Maximum memory, per AMD | 192 GB | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| PowerDedi configuration | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2 × 1.92 TB NVMe | 192 GB DDR5, 2 × 3.84 TB NVMe | 128 GB DDR5, 2 × 1.92 TB NVMe |
| Price | $179/month | $219/month | $159/month |
| Choose it for | Databases, paid hosting, data you cannot afford to corrupt | The most memory and disk; cache-sensitive workloads | Price/performance; eight cities |
What is the EPYC 4005 series?
AMD launched the EPYC 4005 series on 13 May 2025 for small businesses and hosting providers. It uses the same AM5 socket as the earlier EPYC 4004 series and, like it, Ryzen desktop silicon: heise describes the chips as having “the modern Ryzen 9000 technology inside”, and Phoronix calls the line derived from the Ryzen 9000 family. AMD now states that AM5 motherboards with 600- and 800-series chipsets accept both EPYC 4000 and Ryzen 9000 processors, usually after a BIOS update. There are six models:
| Model | Cores / threads | L3 | TDP | Base / boost | AMD 1kU price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPYC 4585PX | 16 / 32 | 128 MB | 170 W | 4.3 / 5.7 GHz | $699 |
| EPYC 4565P | 16 / 32 | 64 MB | 170 W | 4.3 / 5.7 GHz | $589 |
| EPYC 4545P | 16 / 32 | 64 MB | 65 W | 3.0 / 5.4 GHz | $549 |
| EPYC 4465P | 12 / 24 | 64 MB | 65 W | 3.4 / 5.4 GHz | $399 |
| EPYC 4345P | 8 / 16 | 32 MB | 65 W | 3.8 / 5.5 GHz | $329 |
| EPYC 4245P | 6 / 12 | 32 MB | 65 W | 3.9 / 5.4 GHz | $239 |
On paper, the 4585PX matches the Ryzen 9 9950X3D and the 4565P matches the Ryzen 9 9950X: same cores, clocks, L3 and TDP on AMD’s specification pages. The 4545P is the odd one out: when ServeTheHome and Phoronix reviewed the series in 2025, AMD had no 16-core, 65 W Ryzen 9000 part.
What the EPYC badge adds is validation, not silicon. AMD’s datasheet lists multi-year server lifecycle support, server-design and BMC validation with partners, software RAID (RAIDXpert2) and tested server operating systems: Windows Server 2022 and 2025, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 and 10, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 and Ubuntu 22.04. ServeTheHome singles out ECC: on EPYC, ECC UDIMM support is validated for the entire line, from AMD to the server maker, rather than offered by one motherboard vendor on its own. AMD also lists Infinity Guard security features, including memory encryption, with the caveat that server makers must enable them. For a rented server, the vendor warranty sits with the provider rather than with you, so it is left out of this comparison.
Spec sheet: EPYC 4585PX vs 9950X3D vs 9950X
| EPYC 4585PX | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen 9 9950X | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores / threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Base / max boost | 4.3 / 5.7 GHz | 4.3 / 5.7 GHz | 4.3 / 5.7 GHz |
| L3 cache | 128 MB, V-Cache on one of two CCDs | 128 MB, V-Cache on one of two CCDs | 64 MB |
| Default TDP | 170 W | 170 W | 170 W |
| Socket, memory channels | AM5, 2 × DDR5 | AM5, 2 × DDR5 | AM5, 2 × DDR5 |
| Rated memory speed | DDR5-5600 with one DIMM per channel, DDR5-3600 with two | DDR5-5600 with two DIMMs, DDR5-3600 with four | DDR5-5600 with two DIMMs, DDR5-3600 with four |
| Maximum memory | 192 GB ECC | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| ECC | Yes, validated for the series | Yes, “requires mobo support” | Yes, “requires mobo support” |
| PCIe 5.0 lanes | 28 from the CPU, up to 44 with a chipset | 28, of which 24 usable | 28, of which 24 usable |
| Launch | 13 May 2025 | 12 March 2025 | 15 August 2024 |
| Price at launch | $699 (AMD, 1kU) | $699 (Phoronix) | — |
| PassMark single-thread / CPU Mark | 4,540 / 68,910 | 4,737 / 70,101 | 4,726 / 65,698 |
Specifications come from AMD’s product pages, its EPYC 4005 infographic and heise; PassMark figures as of October 2026. PassMark averages user-submitted results, so platform settings move them: AMD specifies the same clocks for the 4585PX and the 9950X3D, yet the server part rates about 4% lower on single-thread.
ECC on AM5: what it protects
Every DDR5 chip has on-die ECC, which is easy to mistake for the real thing. Kingston explains the difference: on-die ECC corrects bit errors inside the DRAM chip, but it cannot correct errors outside the chip or on the bus between the module and the memory controller in the CPU. Full ECC needs modules with extra DRAM bits, such as ECC unbuffered, registered or load-reduced DIMMs, and a processor that uses them to correct errors on the fly.
Memory errors are not rare. In a study of Google’s server fleet from 2006 to 2008, on DDR1, DDR2 and FB-DIMM hardware, about a third of machines saw at least one memory error per year, more than 8% of DIMMs were affected each year, and 1.3% of machines had an uncorrectable error per year. Without ECC, such an error can crash the machine or let applications use corrupted data. The hardware is older than today’s, but it is the scale of the problem that matters: on a database or a server you rent out to customers, a silent bit flip is a data-integrity incident.
ECC is not a backup: it does nothing about software bugs, deleted files or a failing disk. What it does is turn memory faults into corrected, logged events. On Linux, the EDAC subsystem counts them per memory controller and per DIMM, and the kernel documentation calls correctable errors an early sign that a DIMM is beginning to fail:
# corrected (ce) and uncorrected (ue) memory errors, when an EDAC driver is loaded
grep -H . /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc*/ce_count /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc*/ue_count
On AM5, the processor is not the obstacle: AMD lists ECC support for the Ryzen 9 9950X and 9950X3D as well, provided the motherboard supports it. The difference is who validates the whole chain. On EPYC 4005 it is part of the platform; on Ryzen it depends on the board and memory chosen. PowerDedi’s Ryzen configurations use non-ECC memory, so at PowerDedi the 4585PX is the only one of the three with ECC.
Memory: capacity, speed and the two-channel ceiling
All three chips have two DDR5 channels, and that ceiling matters more than any difference between them. AMD rates them at DDR5-5600 with one module per channel and DDR5-3600 with two; heise notes that capacities above 128 GB need more than two modules. AMD quotes 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth for the 4585PX at DDR5-5600; the same arithmetic gives 57.6 GB/s at DDR5-3600.
- Capacity. AMD lists 256 GB for the Ryzen chips and up to 192 GB of ECC memory for EPYC 4005. At launch, heise reported 256 GB, with new 64 GB modules, as still in validation for EPYC.
- Speed. Phoronix tested the 4585PX with DDR5-4800 and DDR5-5600: the geometric mean of 200+ benchmarks moved by 1.1%, with larger effects in CPU-based AI inference and some HPC workloads. We found no published test at DDR5-3600.
- At PowerDedi. The 9950X3D configuration has 192 GB, which on AM5 means four modules and AMD’s DDR5-3600 rating; the 9950X and 4585PX have 128 GB. For what memory costs in 2026 and how that shapes server prices, see RAM prices in 2026.
ServeTheHome ran an EPYC 4005 board with 192 GB in four 48 GB ECC modules and confirmed the drop to DDR5-3600 with two modules per channel. If a workload needs much more memory or bandwidth than this, it has outgrown AM5; see the last section.
PCIe lanes and storage
Each chip has 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes. On Ryzen, AMD counts 24 as usable, because the others link the chipset. For EPYC 4005, AMD notes that chipset-less server boards can use all 28 directly, a B650 chipset raises the total to 36, and the 4585PX page quotes up to 44 with a chipset. That is plenty for a few NVMe drives and a network card, not for a storage server or several GPUs; single-socket EPYC 9004 and 9005 processors such as the 9454P and 9355P have 128 lanes. On a rented server, the practical question is which disks come with it: 2 × 1.92 TB of NVMe on the 4585PX and 9950X, 2 × 3.84 TB on the 9950X3D.
Benchmarks: what Phoronix measured
We found no published same-system comparison of the 4585PX and the 9950X3D, and with identical silicon and clocks, large differences would be surprising. Phoronix did test the 4585PX against the 4565P, the 9950X’s server twin, in the same Supermicro server with 2 × 32 GB of ECC DDR5-5600, Ubuntu 25.04 and Linux 6.14. That isolates what the extra 64 MB of cache is worth on a server:
| Test (Phoronix, May 2025) | EPYC 4565P, 64 MB L3 | EPYC 4585PX, 128 MB L3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geometric mean, 200+ tests | 67.25 | 70.06 | +4.2% |
| ClickHouse, first run (queries/min) | 243.95 | 290.74 | +19.2% |
| ClickHouse, third run (queries/min) | 268.54 | 323.05 | +20.3% |
| nginx, 1,000 connections (requests/s) | 172,894 | 204,495 | +18.3% |
| PostgreSQL 17, read-only, 800 clients (TPS) | 1,678,694 | 1,905,425 | +13.5% |
| PostgreSQL 17, read/write, 800 clients (TPS) | 37,124 | 39,908 | +7.5% |
| PostgreSQL 17, read/write, 500 clients (TPS) | 40,699 | 40,055 | −1.6% |
| MariaDB 11.5, read/write, 64 threads (queries/s) | 167,908 | 164,548 | −2.0% |
| Memcached, 1:100 set/get (ops/s) | 7.97 million | 8.15 million | +2.2% |
| RocksDB 9.0, random read (op/s) | 166.6 million | 161.9 million | −2.9% |
| Linux kernel build, allmodconfig (seconds, lower is better) | 569.80 | 537.93 | 5.6% faster |
| LLVM build (seconds, lower is better) | 294.85 | 272.04 | 7.7% faster |
Both chips averaged 135–140 W of CPU power in that review, with peaks of 206–209 W. Phoronix put the 4585PX 25% ahead of the previous-generation EPYC 4584PX and 88% ahead of Intel’s Xeon 6369P in its geometric mean.
To relate the server parts to the desktop ones, the same test profiles appear in Phoronix’s 9950X3D review. The systems differ: a desktop board with non-ECC DDR5-6000 and Linux 6.13, against a Supermicro server with ECC DDR5-5600 and Linux 6.14. Read this as a sanity check, not a ranking:
| Test (Phoronix) | 9950X | 9950X3D | EPYC 4565P | EPYC 4585PX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PostgreSQL 17, read-only, 500 clients (TPS) | 2,068,560 | 2,098,303 | 1,958,980 | 2,055,793 |
| ClickHouse, first run (queries/min) | 274.37 | 313.49 | 243.95 | 290.74 |
| nginx, 1,000 connections (requests/s) | 186,725 | 220,857 | 172,894 | 204,495 |
| Linux kernel build, allmodconfig (s) | 549.97 | 531.88 | 569.80 | 537.93 |
| LLVM build (s) | 272.85 | 257.79 | 294.85 | 272.04 |
The server parts land 1–11% behind their desktop twins in these tests, a gap that faster memory, a different board and a different kernel could account for on their own. The ranking inside each pair is the same: the V-Cache part leads in every row. To check your own workload, the Phoronix Test Suite can rerun a published result and show yours side by side; phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2505056-PTS-AMDEPYCG06 repeats the whole EPYC 4005 review.
Prices and configurations at PowerDedi
| Server | Memory | Storage | Price | Cities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPYC 4585PX | 128 GB DDR5 ECC | 2 × 1.92 TB NVMe | $179/month | Amsterdam, Frankfurt, London, New York |
| Ryzen 9 9950X3D | 192 GB DDR5 | 2 × 3.84 TB NVMe | $219/month | Amsterdam, Frankfurt, New York, Los Angeles |
| Ryzen 9 9950X | 128 GB DDR5 | 2 × 1.92 TB NVMe | $159/month | Amsterdam, Frankfurt, London, New York, Miami, Los Angeles, Singapore, Tokyo |
All three are in stock and provisioned about 15 minutes after payment confirmation, each with its own 10 Gbps unmetered port, IPMI/KVM access and month-to-month billing. The rest of the line-up is in the AMD Ryzen and AMD EPYC ranges.
Which one should you choose?
- Databases and paid hosting: EPYC 4585PX. If a memory error would corrupt customer data or a database page, ECC is worth more than the 9950X3D’s extra 64 GB. The 4585PX keeps the V-Cache gains Phoronix measured on the same server: 13.5% more read-only PostgreSQL throughput at 800 clients and about 19% more ClickHouse queries than the 4565P.
- Maximum memory and disk: Ryzen 9 9950X3D. 192 GB of RAM and 2 × 3.84 TB of NVMe suit many services, containers or game servers on one machine, if you accept non-ECC memory running at up to DDR5-3600. For game servers specifically, see Ryzen 9 9950X vs 9950X3D for game servers.
- Price/performance: Ryzen 9 9950X. Across the roughly 400 tests of Phoronix’s desktop review, the 9950X3D was only 2.5% faster on average. If your workloads are not in the cache-sensitive minority, the 9950X costs less and is available in eight cities, including London, Miami, Singapore and Tokyo.
When none of the three fits: if you need ECC with more than 128 GB of memory, the next step is an EPYC 9004 or 9005 server; and if you need a V-Cache CPU in Miami, Singapore or Tokyo, we have no AM5 configuration with it there.
When to step up to EPYC 9004 or 9005
AM5’s two memory channels are the hard limit. AMD’s EPYC 9454P has 12 channels of DDR5-4800 for 460.8 GB/s per socket and 128 PCIe 5.0 lanes; the Zen 5 EPYC 9355P has 12 channels of DDR5-6400 for 614 GB/s. That is five to seven times the 4585PX’s 89.6 GB/s. The price is clock speed: base clocks of 2.75 GHz on the 9454P and 3.55 GHz on the 9355P, and PassMark single-thread ratings of 2,988 and 3,747, against 4,540 for the 4585PX.
Step up when a workload needs more than 128 to 192 GB, saturates memory bandwidth, or runs dozens of virtual machines; stay on AM5 when a few fast threads matter most. At PowerDedi, the EPYC 9454P comes with 256 GB of ECC memory for $489 a month, in stock, and the EPYC 9355P with 384 GB for $519 a month, built to order in 24 hours. Our guide to EPYC 9005 “Turin” servers covers that generation in detail.
Sources
- AMD EPYC™ 4585PX, AMD EPYC™ 4005 Server CPUs, AMD EPYC 4005 Series Processors data sheet, Affordable server solutions for SMBs and hosters (infographic) and 5 Reasons AMD EPYC™ 4005 Series Processors Are Your Trusted Choice for SMB and Hosting — AMD
- AMD Unveils EPYC 4005 Series Processors, Delivering Workload-Optimized Solutions for Entry-Level Enterprise — AMD Newsroom, 13 May 2025
- AMD Socket AM5 Platform for AMD EPYC™ 4000 Series Server CPUs — AMD
- AMD Ryzen™ 9 9950X3D, AMD Ryzen™ 9 9950X, AMD EPYC™ 9454P and AMD EPYC™ 9355P — AMD product specifications
- AMD Epyc 4005: Six processors for small servers with ECC RAM — heise online, 13 May 2025
- AMD EPYC 4565P & EPYC 4585PX Benchmarks Against Xeon 6369P: EPYC 4005 Champions Entry-Level Server Performance and AMD EPYC 4005 Series Launches For Entry-Level Zen 5 Servers — Phoronix, 13 May 2025
- AMD EPYC 4585PX & EPYC 4565P With DDR5-4800 vs. DDR5-5600 Performance — Phoronix, 29 May 2025
- AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Delivers Excellent Performance For Linux Developers, Creators & Technical Computing — Phoronix, 11 March 2025
- AMD EPYC 4005 Grado is Great and Intel is Exposed — ServeTheHome, 13 May 2025
- DDR5 Memory Standard: An introduction to the next generation of DRAM module technology — Kingston Technology
- DRAM Errors in the Wild: A Large-Scale Field Study — Schroeder, Pinheiro and Weber, University of Toronto and Google
- Reliability, Availability and Serviceability (RAS) — Linux kernel documentation
- CPU single-thread performance and High-end CPU chart — PassMark Software




